Materiality of Data and Bits – blog post
Source: Materiality of Data and Bits | Home
This article is okay – the best bits are that he references some people writing about data that are new to me, so to follow up his sources (which aren’t included annoyingly).
i.e.
Lisa Gitelman and Virginia Jackson explain partly why “data” seems to have an ethereal definition in their introduction to “Raw Data” is an Oxymoron. Data “has become what is called a mass noun, so it can take a singular verb”
Trevor Owen argues that “data is an artifact or a text that can hold the same potential evidentiary value as any other kind of artifact,” but data itself “is not a kind of evidence; it is a potential source of information that can hold evidentiary value”
Gitelman, Jackson, Owen, and Michael Witmore divorce “data” from the computer. Gitelman and Jackson think of “data as a matter of disciplines”
Jean-Francois Blanchette explains that “bits move up from their grounding as signals in some physical media (fiber optic, magnetic drive, electrical wires) to binary information organized according to units defined by each layer (file, datagram, etc.)”
http://www.materialworldblog.com/2010/12/a-material-history-of-bits/