Tagged: IA Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • julie 10:11 am on May 20, 2015 Permalink
    Tags: Ashby, IA, , zooniverse   

    William Ross Ashby: Intelligence Amplification 

    About selection and problem solving. How making a good choice is how we progress in all things. What happens when we have no choice? What happens when we make a ting choice and that is feeding into a bigger choice (voting, zooniverse, etc)? With some of these things we don’t know the end choices, we can only make the one that is in front of us here and now. Like bird and fish we can shoal without a goal.

    William Ross Ashby: Intelligence Amplification[edit]

    The term intelligence amplification (IA) has enjoyed a wide currency since William Ross Ashby wrote of “amplifying intelligence” in his Introduction to Cybernetics (1956). Related ideas were explicitly proposed as an alternative to Artificial Intelligence by Hao Wang from the early days of automatic theorem provers.

    ..”problem solving” is largely, perhaps entirely, a matter of appropriate selection. Take, for instance, any popular book of problems and puzzles. Almost every one can be reduced to the form: out of a certain set, indicate one element. … It is, in fact, difficult to think of a problem, either playful or serious, that does not ultimately require an appropriate selection as necessary and sufficient for its solution.

    It is also clear that many of the tests used for measuring “intelligence” are scored essentially according to the candidate’s power of appropriate selection. … Thus it is not impossible that what is commonly referred to as “intellectual power” may be equivalent to “power of appropriate selection”. Indeed, if a talking Black Box were to show high power of appropriate selection in such matters — so that, when given difficult problems it persistently gave correct answers — we could hardly deny that it was showing the ‘behavioral’ equivalent of “high intelligence”.

    If this is so, and as we know that power of selection can be amplified, it seems to follow that intellectual power, like physical power, can be amplified. Let no one say that it cannot be done, for the gene-patterns do it every time they form a brain that grows up to be something better than the gene-pattern could have specified in detail. What is new is that we can now do it synthetically, consciously, deliberately.

    Ashby, W.R., An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1956. Reprinted, Methuen and Company, London, UK, 1964.

    via Intelligence amplification – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

     
  • julie 8:45 am on May 20, 2015 Permalink
    Tags: AI, IA, , licklider   

    Man-Computer Symbiosis paper by Licklider 

    “Man-Computer Symbiosis” is a key speculative paper published in 1960 by psychologist/computer scientist J.C.R. Licklider, which envisions that mutually-interdependent, “living together”, tightly-coupled human brains and computing machines would prove to complement each other’s strengths to a high degree:

    Man-computer symbiosis is a subclass of man-machine systems. There are many man-machine systems. At present, however, there are no man-computer symbioses. The purposes of this paper are to present the concept and, hopefully, to foster the development of man-computer symbiosis by analyzing some problems of interaction between men and computing machines, calling attention to applicable principles of man-machine engineering, and pointing out a few questions to which research answers are needed. The hope is that, in not too many years, human brains and computing machines will be coupled together very tightly, and that the resulting partnership will think as no human brain has ever thought and process data in a way not approached by the information-handling machines we know today.

    Licklider, J.C.R., “Man-Computer Symbiosis”, IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, vol. HFE-1, 4-11, Mar 1960.

    In Licklider’s vision, many of the pure artificial intelligence systems envisioned at the time by over-optimistic researchers would prove unnecessary. (This paper is also seen by some historians as marking the genesis of ideas about computer networks which later blossomed into the Internet).

    via Intelligence amplification – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

    The above quote (my emphasis) is a good segway into the idea of us learning about our objects. Symbiosis is both ways – not just one way (i.e. man dictating to everything else). What does it mean to become highly familiar with our materials, our environment and our actions on and in them? What will come out of this new symbiotic closeness?

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel