This week:
RFID system. New papers and insight from Susan Imberman and Dan McCloskey (CUNY) about their RFID tracking systems. They are willing to share the data they have, in real-time too when it’s ready.
TO DO: read papers carefully and ascertain what kind of analysis they are using and how relevant, if at all, to us.

Contacted Pet Detect who have a universal scanner that detects AVID tags. They are quoting for a system.
Plan B is to get Mike Harrison to build it. I am happy to just pay for this and get it installed, would rather focus on the software framework, which needs to be reusable and future proof, initial specifications developing here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mgJJ2LX2fCUtRphFdgwWl2YxhFc5v-MTgbadHfOahGE/edit

MATERIALS:
Skylar Tibbets et al – paper on active 3D printed materials. Thoroughly assessed this and am exploring how this technique can be used to activate the objects, would be best if not water activated but electrically conductive / heat responsive. Heat response material probably faster than the water expansion, and much more precision to target small areas.

In the paper, the author talks about self-evolving structures, which gives too much importance to the relatively simple motion driven by a state change. The object moves to a position and then returns to its start point. Self-transformation (used on page 5) is also not strictly true as the material changes in response to an environmental change, it doesn’t come from within itself. Anyway.

How can I combine a data-driven response with an object that has some innate movement? Does the data become a trigger, a time of activation? or permission for the thing to move? Would it be the ‘life’ in the object – i.e. without a data stream this object is inert (dead) even with it’s potential. Could the data affect the environmental conditions that the objects exist in as well as sending/modulating electrical signals?

The objects fabricated in these experiments are multi-materials embedded in a 3D structure. One material acts as a rigid core and the expanding (state-changing) material is positioned in such a way that when it expands it deforms the rigid sections. They refer to this as a Digital Material [http://www.stratasys.com/materials/polyjet/digital-materials] – a material that can be adjusted digitally (in terms of physical structure).

INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENTS (lecture notes)
“The most profound technologies are those that disappear. They weave themselves into the fabric of everyday life until they are indistinguishable from it.”
— Mark Weiser’s “The Computer for the Twenty-First Century” (Scientific American, 1991, pp. 66–75)

Intelligent Environments Manifesto – ref Augusto, Callaghan 2013 — in manifesto – one point says “to work under the principal that the user is in command” – WHY? Do we not need to relinquish control? How can we possibly command of something that we don’t know about? Yes these sensors can oversimplify reality but they bring to our attention more that we would OVERTLY think about usually… this is more complex?

ETHICAL ISSUES in (PRODUCT) DESIGN
NMR – what are the ethical issues to consider – can an object move in a subliminal way that make you feel awkward or at ease or stressed? How can these behaviours be recognised? Do we need to control for this if we are assuming the object is just communicating for it’s source. How far do we go in censoring the data? What are the ethical issues of data manipulation from a real-time stream of life data?