Tagged: taxonomy Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • julie 1:11 pm on July 21, 2015 Permalink
    Tags: getty, taxonomy   

    Getty vocab usage 

    Intro to Getty’s cataloguing system. Really helpful page on the difference between Display (text that will be read by the end-user) and Indexing (text that uses a controlled vocabulary (AAT) for finding and accessing the works)

    https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/intro_to_cco_cdwa.pdf [pdf]

    DISPLAY VS INDEXING Patricia Harpring © 2015 J. Paul Getty Trust. For educational purposes only. Do not distribute.

    • Display refers to how the data looks to the end user in the database, on a Web site, on a wall or slide label, or in a publication
    • Information for display should be in a format that is easily read and understood by users
    •  Free-text or concatenated from controlled fields
    •  Indexing refers to the process of evaluating information and designating indexing terms by using controlled vocabulary that will aid in finding and accessing the cultural work record
    •  By human labor, not to the automatic parsing of data into a database index
     
  • julie 4:11 pm on July 20, 2015 Permalink
    Tags: taxonomy   

    ADA | Archive of Digital Art 

    Home – ADA | Archive of Digital Art.

    Use for analysis of descriptions of dat art

     
  • julie 10:44 am on July 7, 2015 Permalink
    Tags: , taxonomy   

    re3data – schema 

    Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories

    Version 2.2 December 2014

    doi: http://doi.org/10.2312/re3.006

    http://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:758898:3/component/escidoc:775891/re3data_schema_v2-2_public_final-2014-12-03.pdf

    Research data are valuable and ubiquitous. The permanent access to research data is a challenge for all stakeholders in the scientific community. The long-term preservation and the principle of open access to research data offer broad opportunities for the scientific community. More and more universities and research centres are starting to build research data repositories allowing permanent access to data sets in a trustworthy environment. Due to disciplinary requirements, the landscape of data repositories is very heterogeneous. Thus it is difficult for researchers, funding bodies, publishers and scholarly institutions to select appropriate repositories for storage and search of research data. re3data.org is a global registry of research data repositories that covers research data repositories from different academic disciplines. It presents repositories for the permanent storage and access of data sets to researchers, funding bodies, publishers and scholarly institutions. re3data.org promotes a culture of sharing, increased access and better visibility of research data. The registry is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG)1 and went online in autumn 2012.

     
  • julie 6:04 pm on June 29, 2013 Permalink
    Tags: taxonomy,   

    A Taxonomy of Data Visualization 

    For some time at Visualizing, we’ve been working on a commonsense taxonomy of data visualization. This is still a work in progress, but we wanted to involve the wider community in the discussion.

    There are already all-inclusive glossaries of specific techniques, and there are several academic approaches to classification (Bertin, Schneiderman, etc.). But we’re looking for something in between: a general, top-level language to describe the forms used in visualization and information graphics. It should be useful to experts and non-experts alike, and so requires a balance between familiar words and ideas on the one hand and rigorous thinking on the other.

    via A Taxonomy of Data Visualization | visualizing.org.

     
  • julie 6:57 pm on June 28, 2013 Permalink
    Tags: taxonomy,   

     

    A Periodic Table of Visualization Methods.

    Data Visualisation taxonomy of sorts in a rollover graphic format. Ironically it is very ugly, and the design requires some serious typographic overhaul. Anyhow – a useful mapping of data visualisations.

     
  • julie 5:55 pm on June 27, 2013 Permalink
    Tags: taxonomy   

    dataists » A Taxonomy of Data Science 

    5 steps of what a data scientist does, in roughly chronological order: Obtain, Scrub, Explore, Model, and Interpret, by Hilary Mason (bit.ly chief scientist):

    Both within the academy and within tech startups, we’ve been hearing some similar questions lately: Where can I find a good data scientist? What do I need to learn to become a data scientist? Or more succinctly: What is data science?

    We’ve variously heard it said that data science requires some command-line fu for data procurement and preprocessing, or that one needs to know some machine learning or stats, or that one should know how to `look at data’. All of these are partially true, so we thought it would be useful to propose one possible taxonomy — we call it the Snice* taxonomy — of what a data scientist does, in roughly chronological order: Obtain, Scrub, Explore, Model, and iNterpret (or, if you like, OSEMN, which rhymes with possum).

    Different data scientists have different levels of expertise with each of these 5 areas, but ideally a data scientist should be at home with them all. We describe each one of these steps briefly

    Since histograms of real-valued data are contingent on choice of binning, we should remember that they an art project rather than a form of analytics in themselves.

    via dataists » A Taxonomy of Data Science.

     
  • julie 4:22 pm on June 27, 2013 Permalink
    Tags: taxonomy   

    A Taxonomy of Data Types 

    A Taxonomy of Data Types – Statistical Machine Learning and Visualization.

    A table of data types that refers to distribution, for example:

    type: categoric atom example: word in Eng Lang distribution example: Multinomial (1,theta)

    This taxonomy at the technical end of the data type spectrum and is unlikely to be used by artists.

    It is useful to separate machine learning and visualization techniques (k-NN, PCA, etc.) from specific data domains (text, images, etc.). We should be able to come up with a taxonomy of data types on one hand and a library of techniques suitable for each data type on the other hand. Then, given a specific data domain we can identify the appropriate data type and follow up with one or more appropriate analysis/visualization techniques.

    This is by no means completely satisfactory as each data domain has its own peculiarities and any attempt to come up with a short taxonomy is bound to be a “lossy approximation”. But as many approximations I believe it is one that is useful and worthy of consideration.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel